If let's say the cameras are accurate 80% of the time on a large scale that otherwise would not have been covered by security, I would sacrifice the 20% that would be wrongly convicted to increase the conviction rates of actual criminals, regardless of the 20%'s individual liberties.
Also with predictive analytics, of course coming from a bad area will make you more likely to become a criminal so why wouldn't AI lean that way?
If let's say the cameras are accurate 80% of the time on a large scale that otherwise would not have been covered by security, I would sacrifice the 20% that would be wrongly convicted to increase the conviction rates of actual criminals, regardless of the 20%'s individual liberties.
Also with predictive analytics, of course coming from a bad area will make you more likely to become a criminal so why wouldn't AI lean that way?